Ben's opinions. Check them out.

Tag: Politics

George Floyd and the sad truth of racism, not only in the US, but the UK

So, I’m sure by now we know the news of another African-American man being murdered by police. I don’t know about you, but this particular incident made me furious, and if you knew me very well, you’d know that not much gets me upset. It is not only about police brutality but the topic of racism against blacks as a whole.

“I can’t breathe”

I have been talking about the incident with my family on a daily basis, and as a young black British man, there was a feeling of “Is this who we are as humans?”

But people like me, not just in the US, have had enough.

George Floyd should still be alive today. What angers me about the whole situation is the manner in which events played out.

George Floyd and the subsequent protests after his murder
Source: Metro.co.uk

“A forgery in process.” Now while I do not know what was said between the officers and George Floyd, I do not understand why Floyd was mistreated for this allegation. If counterfeit money was given, why couldn’t Police have simply asked him to pay the sum? My mum and I had a conversation the other day, and she said she sometimes mistakenly gives coin change in the wrong currency shortly after returning from our holidays. Police are not called, but rather, her and the cashier laugh it off and she pays the correct amount. Who’s to say that he received a counterfeit bill from a previous transaction and did not know that it was not legal tender?

In the aftermath of the atrocious crime by Derek Chauvin and the other police officers, there have been protests in all 50 states, as well as all around the world, in places such as the UK, Germany and Canada and Australia.

I do not condone the violence and looting which has taken place, because you are destroying certain people’s livelihoods, particularly those from poorer backgrounds. However, because there is ongoing systemic racism, you can understand why many blacks are angry. If you provoke someone so much after they peacefully try to reach a compromise, it is as if the instigators are not adhering to the terms of their social contract. If police, who are meant to “protect and serve”, abuse their power against minorities, you cannot expect people to be civil and obedient. They’ll want to fight back. I keep seeing the quote from Dr. Martin Luther King Jr, which is “riots are the voice of the unheard”. Powerful.

The four officers charged with Floyd’s murder
Source: CNN

What can institutions do to make the UK less ignorant?

While I was in high school, history was one of my favourite subjects. But now when I think about George Floyd’s murder, I do believe the UK can do more in educating students about its own painful past regarding black people. I am grateful that I live in a household that is incredibly knowledgeable, because events about black history which they did not teach in school, continue to be taught by my parents. One could say that if the UK did not have stringent, clear laws and banned firearms, who’s to say that the police would not abuse their power over here? That is why I do not buy it when people say, “Oh look at America, they have so many problems.” We have our own problems too.

The reason I mention history lessons is because the current curriculum does not include pertinent black history topics for all students from a young age. We are taught about the Battle of Hastings, British monarchies, and the World Wars. I was taught about the US Civil Rights Movement as part of my GCSE coursework. But when I thought this, I asked myself, when, where and how often does the British curriculum address its own history of racial problems?

Does the UK talk about its role in the Atlantic slave trade, which was arguably the worst? Do we talk about British colonialism? Do we teach about abolitionism and the likes of William Wilberforce? What about the Windrush generation that had been ignored for so long that it was only in the news a couple of years ago? What about learning about racially charged incidents against black men such as Stephen Lawrence?

If they did I am sure that there would be less ignorant people. Exposure to your own countries’ history puts the matter at hand in perspective, allowing more empathy of others regardless of their race.

Stephen Lawrence was a black man who was killed in a racially motivated attack, in South-East London, in 1993
Source: The Independent

What YOU can do to become less ignorant and create change

It was good to see many of my friends showing solidarity, sharing social media stories and supporting black businesses after the Floyd incident. However, one can do more than upload a black screen on their Instagram page with a hashtag. I know that some people are doing it to show support for the Black Lives Matter movement, however, change is needed. It starts with home education at a young age.

“You’re not born a bigot; you have to learn to be a bigot. Anything you learn, you can unlearn.” This was said by Jane Elliott. Jerome Boateng recently said, “no child is born racist”. Simple words, but it has to be said.

Parents and legal guardians have a primary responsibility to teach positive attitudes towards other races because children model the behaviour of their parents.

I experienced “micro-aggression” growing up in London and Norwich regularly. The phrase “micro-aggression” is one I do not like. I believe it is a pretext for making racist jokes.

“Oh, you speak very well, what type of school did you go to?”

“Ben, you’re so white.”

“Is your favourite restaurant KFC?”

These are the kind of phrases I heard growing up. Can you see the ignorance? Can black people not be good orators regardless of the type of school they attend? Why can’t being black mean having a calm and collected demeanour, where you treat people with respect?

I did not let such statements upset me, because growing up my parents taught me to behave with magnanimity. However, statements such as those above should not be the norm and when this occurs it needs to be called out for what it is.

I have been asked what we can do as a society. We need to educate ourselves by reading books. We also need to watch films and documentaries that relate to this matter. We are in lockdown due to COVID-19, so try to learn something new. Subsequently, we must educate our families and friends. Yes, it is a sensitive topic but I’d rather white people talk to blacks about the reality of this issue, instead of shying away from it or even blurting out silly remarks which should have been confined to the past.

This is Stephen Lawrence’s mother, Baroness Doreen Lawrence talking to my sister, Alice. She was invited by my sister to talk at our high school about why we should celebrate and embrace diversity.
Source: Norwich School

Aside from protesting, those who are eligible to vote must do so. Second, to bring about change, writing to your local MP is a simple but effective way to express grievances. Third is signing petitions at the https://petition.parliament.uk/ website. Debates in Parliament are triggered if 100,000 signatures are reached. Finally, visiting Central Lobby in Parliament, as you do not need to make an appointment to meet your MP, although an appointment is recommended. The desk at Central Lobby will attempt to contact the MP you are asking for.

There are other ways of getting involved.

Below are a few of my recommendations:

BOOKS: Reni Eddo-Lodge’s “Why I am No Longer Talking to White People About Race.”

Robin DiAngelo’s “White Fragility.”

FILMS: Coach Carter starring Samuel L. Jackson (everyone should watch this), When They See Us (both of these are on Netflix UK as of 4th June 2020).

Change can happen, only if you really want it.

Looking back at the outcome of the 2019 Election

 

We are slightly tired of British elections, aren’t we?

The UK just went through its third election in a short space of five years.

Electoral fatigue? Definitely.

Necessary? Absolutely.

“Dither and delay”. My new favourite phrase.

This being from Parliament on the topic of Brexit. And the leadership struggle within the Conservative party.

Despite the three elections, Conservatives beat Labour and now have a chance to “GET BREXIT DONE”.

Labour is currently going through a peculiar transition stage. As of January 2020, debates have focused on whether they should adopt a more centrist approach, on all topics. The identity crisis that the Left has, has not helped them for the past few years.

I will be discussing the economic interests of both parties and state whether they can last long term.

 

boris

Boris speaking to an audience during election campaign in Uttoxeter
Source: https://www.vox.com/world/2019/12/12/20999535/boris-johnson-uk-election-results-brexit

 

Boris gets his mandate

Mr. Johnson is in No.10. It’s definitely safe to say he’s in a good position to get objectives achieved on his agenda.

Traditionally, the Conservatives are the party for lower taxes, private ownership, and increased defence spending.

The reason that this election took place was due to Brexit, yes. They needed a mandate after the in-out referendum.

However, is one of the reasons the performance of the British economy?

Since 2010, the Conservatives have managed to have steady economic growth. One factor for the Conservatives remaining in government for so long is because of Labour’s past performance during the Blair government. Blair inherited some Thatcherite ideas pertaining to the economy. He called it the “Third Way”, in which there was favour for privatisation, free market policies and increased defence spending.

While Brexit has been the topic of discussion, could it be argued that Jeremy Corbyn’s policies are a bit outdated for this current generation?

According to Nabarro and Schulz from the Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS), they state that if there was no deal Brexit, there would be fiscal loosening of 2%. However, there will be growth, albeit slow, over the next 3 years.[1]

The graph below shows that there is potential for economic growth in post-Brexit Britain.[2]

 

under brexit

 

Corbyn and Old Labour – An inseparable bond

Jeremy Corbyn’s policies are very popular in the UK. This is notable among high school and university students as well as working class people.

Corbyn is synonymous with Old Labour. The two go hand in hand.

Unfortunately, the policies made by his party were seen to be “unreasonable” and “unrealistic”.

According to the Labour Party manifesto, there was a desire to raise the income tax on those earning more than £80,000. [3] While the proposal could be seen as a desire for a fair distribution of wealth, the super-rich did not see this as an appealing reason to vote for Labour. For example, John Caudwell, the founder for Phones4U, stated that he would potentially leave the UK if there was to be a Labour government. [4]

Labour’s stance on the economy is completely understandable. The Tories who have been in power since 2010 have introduced austerity measures which have not been popular among many people across both political parties. The measures have allowed a higher growth in wages over the past few years. [5] The graph below from the Office of National Statistics shows the steady increase of wages since 2014, against fluctuating inflation.[6] Perhaps, people who have seen their wages increase were not in favour of a political party that wanted to tax income.

The narrative that “you work hard, and you get your reward” will have been used by the Conservatives as a justification for their policy implementation.

 

wage

 

Despite wage growth, the austerity measures have not been met with positive reception and have been met with fierce scorn from many Britons. According to Resolution Foundation, a think-tank, government spending fell from £334 billion to £302 billion from 2011-2018, which is a 10% fall. [7]

People who voted for the Tories have not hidden their displeasure. The poll below conducted two years ago, shows dissatisfaction with austerity measures and why Labour have run on the platform of nationalisation of public services and a higher income tax.[8]

questionnaire

 

Where next for Labour

Heffernan describes the similarities between Thatcherism and New Labour policies. He describes the economic success from Mrs Thatcher’s premiership, which Tony Blair and his chancellor Gordon Brown attempted to do, namely market driven economic growth to help with public service investment. [9]

Labour were in debt due to heavy defence spending, particularly from the War in Afghanistan and more significantly the War in Iraq. This approach has tainted Blair’s legacy. There’s no doubting that. However, should people in the Labour party be slightly more open-minded in shifting their views slightly more to the centre? Unfortunately, the mention of “Blairism” or “Blairite” is one met with disdain; however, it should be noted that Labour enjoyed their best spell in government since the 1970s.

There is an appetite for socialism in the UK. Labour must play their cards right and elect a leader that appeals to not just those in higher education, but the middle class too.

 

 

 

 

 

[1] Nabarro, Benjamin, and Christian Schulz. 2019. “UK Economic Outlook in Four Brexit Scenarios.” IFS. The IFS. October 8, 2019. https://www.ifs.org.uk/publications/14421.

[2] Nabarro, Benjamin, and Christian Schulz. 2019. “UK Economic Outlook in Four Brexit Scenarios.” IFS. The IFS. October 8, 2019. https://www.ifs.org.uk/publications/14421.

[3] “Rebuild Our Public Services.” n.d. The Labour Party. Accessed January 28, 2020. https://labour.org.uk/manifesto/rebuild-our-public-services/.

[4] Neate, Rupert. 2019. “Super-Rich Prepare to Leave UK ‘within Minutes’ If Labour Wins Election.” The Guardian. Guardian News and Media. November 2, 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2019/nov/02/super-rich-leave-uk-labour-election-win-jeremy-corbyn-wealth-taxes.

[5] “UK Wage Growth Picks up to 11-Year High.” 2019. BBC News. BBC. August 13, 2019. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-49328855.

[6] “UK Wage Growth Picks up to 11-Year High.” 2019. BBC News. BBC. August 13, 2019. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-49328855.

[7] Inman, Phillip. 2019. “Has the Age of Austerity Really Come to an End?” The Guardian. Guardian News and Media. September 5, 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/sep/05/has-the-age-of-austerity-really-come-to-an-end-sajid-javid.

[8] Singh, Matt. 2018. “Poll Shows Even Tory Voters Feel Austerity Has Gone Too Far.” Subscribe to Read | Financial Times. Financial Times. May 2, 2018. https://www.ft.com/content/c8d95118-4a42-11e8-8c77-ff51caedcde6.

[9] Heffernan, Richard. “Labour’s new labour legacy: Politics after Blair and Brown.” Political Studies Review 9, no. 2 (2011): 163-177.

The Russia Story continues

It looks as if US President Trump’s inevitable impeachment is getting closer each day, with the first bombshell of 2018…….
Michael Wolff a well-known controversial author decided to publish the book, revealing chaos that had been going on in the White House since the inception of the Trump presidency.
Interestingly, Wolff had been invited to various parts of the White House, being allowed to observe and take notes in meetings that were going on.
Trump had allowed Wolff to interview him many times, over 200 times in fact, because he liked a story that Wolff had written about him in the Hollywood Reporter.
trump and wolff
 It seems shocking that Trump would allow a reporter to conduct many interviews and be present for many confidential meetings. This was bound to happen in a large form eventually, because his own White House staff have been leaking stories to the press anonymously.
The book called “Fire and Fury” was named after Trump’s threat to North Korea, after having an argument with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un over the two countries nuclear capabilities.
Once the book had been announced, by Wolff, Trump’s lawyer attempted to block its release using a cease and desist order. It was ultimately unsuccessful, which even led to Wolff pushing the release date one day forward, due to popular demand.
However, why would Trump want obtain a court order to block the sale of a book?
I don’t think embarrassment is the issue. He lavishes in doing that already.
Or is he just scared?
This is the key…. This could be Trump’s downfall:
Steve Bannon.
Steve Bannon has been through “Day 1”. He has stuck with Trump from his controversial statements from his days on the campaign trail, to his antics on the world stage in the Oval Office. He has insulted opponents of Trump, such as CNN and MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough, to show loyalty. Even after leaving his post as chief strategist, he continued to support Trump, often calling him offering support when General Kelly, the White House Chief of Staff was not around.
The Washington Post reported that Trump and Bannon were still talking in October 2017:

trump and bannon

Did Michael Wolff somehow twist his words to get closer to Trump and his team? Credit- ABC NEWS

However, Trump made a fatal mistake. We all know that when the media focuses on a story regarding Mr Trump, he likes to use Twitter to complain about it or attack an individual.
Here, when it was revealed that Bannon had made comments in Wolff’s book, Trump took to cameras and Twitter to make his feelings known:
“Steve Bannon has nothing to do with me or my presidency.”
“When he was fired, he lost his mind.”
This was a Trump White House statement to the press after they pressed him for his opinion on Steve Bannon’s remarks.

trump book tweet

Trump’s tweet on Bannon regarding Bannon’s job   Credit- Twitter: @realDonaldTrump

This could spell bad news for Trump.
Why?
He doesn’t seem to understand that Bannon is a “snake”. He is no longer in a job at the White House, so he is free to say whatever he wants.
Bannon recently said that Mueller would crack Donald Trump Jr like an egg, due to “treasonous” meetings with the Russians.

trump jr and muller

Should Don Jr have a reason to be worried? Credit- liberalamerica.org

 However, on 7th January 2018, Bannon apologised, stating that President Trump was a “great man” and a “patriot.”
It seems to me as if Bannon is trying to play mind games with Trump.
If you really wished your boss well or were trying to stop more revelations coming out for the Russian investigation, you would keep quiet.
Most people that Trump has insulted, including his own supporters, other people on his transition team and Republican Senators, have still stuck with him through his controversy.
If you look at it, Bannon is really the first to say anything revealing to the public.
Could this book be the end of Trump?

trump book cover

As of 20th January 2018, it is the best selling book in it’s genre worldwide Credit- Amazon

The Snap Election – What next?

On the 8th May, the UK had another general election.  We saw the Conservatives emerge victorious, albeit with the result they were not looking for – losing their majority, with Labour taking many traditionally Conservative strongholds.

The result was another shock to many British people, with many claiming that this result shows just how unpredictable politics can be. Only two polls successfully predicted the outcome of the election.

Some have called for Theresa May to resign due to this result, saying that she ran an uninspiring campaign, showed arrogance by not turning up to the televised debates and for not reaching out to young voters.

Who could replace May?

Jacob Rees-Mogg?

Image result for jacob rees mogg question time

Jacob Rees-Mogg alongside David Dimbleby on an episode of Question Time. Is he ready to be leader of the Conservatives? Credit: BBC NEWS

Boris?

Image result for boris johnson rugby tackle

Moments like this make people question, is Boris the man we want for Prime Minister? Credit: BBC NEWS

Rees-Mogg is a popular MP in his party, known for his witty speeches and use of the filibuster. However, due to his posh demeanour, would everyone approve?

No one can question Boris Johnson’s intellect, however, it is his colourful personality that creates comedic headlines, which some people feel a Prime Minister should not be associated with.

The Conservatives have been viewed as a “party for the rich”, with many critics highlighting the fact that the party fails to help the young and the less fortunate. Since the Conservatives have come into power, the government has been under fire for its approach to the economy, with many disagreeing with the party’s austerity measures. The economy has improved since the recession of 2008, however, the Tories have come under fire from those on the left saying that she does exploits those that are less well-off.

So, what does this mean for Great Britain?

Will we have another coalition, this time the Conservatives and the DUP?

Will another election be called?

Are we at a point of voter fatigue, with 4 general votes in the UK in just 3 years?

cameron-clegg.jpg

Will we see something like this in the near future? Credit: BBC NEWS

MINORITIES AND THE YOUTH LET THEIR VOICES BE HEARD

So how did we end up in this post-election chaos?

Brexit was one of the key issues during this election. Many people want a good trade deal with EU once Great Britain finally leaves.

Conservatives mainly wanted the EU law precedence over Parliament law to be abolished. On the other hand, Labour wanted to protect the rights of EU nationals, which would have given Labour more support during the election.

The youth was encouraged to vote in this election, because the implications of Brexit would affect them most in years to come. According to a YouGov survey the youth vote (18-24 year olds) was around 64% for Labour and only 21% for the Conservatives. The overall electoral turnout was 69%, which was a 2% increase from the 2015 election.

The reason for Corbyn’s increase in popularity, especially with the youth of today is his promises to improve public services and to scrap tuition fees for students. Some claim that this is unrealistic, because the money would come from taxing the rich people that have earned their money, as well as big businesses. However, this was a real opener for the Conservatives, because they now need to show that they represent not only the middle class, but the working class and the upcoming generation, the youths.

Recently, at the Glastonbury Festival, Corbyn came and addressed the youth to a positive reaction. He engaged well and people discussed on social media how a Prime Minister should be able to meet and greet regular people to show that they care about their citizens.

Image result for jeremy corbyn glastonbury

Jeremy Corbyn saw his party have a large youth vote. Has this always been the Conservatives weak spot? Do they fail to engage the younger generation? Credit: The Huffington Post

NATIONAL SECURITY MAY DECIDE MAY’S FATE

The United Kingdom is renowned for its prevention of attacks on home soil. Unfortunately, in the space of four months there have been four attacks, with two occurring in one month. This became a major issue during the election, because people were unsure which government could prevent any large-scale attack.

The London attack a few days before the election again raised questions as to whether May expand on her “Snooper’s Charter” if elected. Her critics have stated that this is a violation of privacy, a basic human right, however supporters have argued is “if you are not doing wrong, you have nothing to hide.”

Image result for theresa may in the house of commons

Should the UK have more surveillance online to ensure that we are safer? Credit: The Telegraph 

The Conservatives had a relatively low terrorist threat during the coalition, but Theresa May has come under increased criticism from the opposition, because of the reduction of police. The cuts of around 20,000 police officers gave Corbyn the argument that the attacks could have been prevented if fully staffed.

Terrorism could decrease substantially if a good negotiation for Brexit is agreed. Brexit could potentially mean immigration is going to be clamped down, making it harder for EU nationals to come to the country.

Despite Corbyn’s popularity with the youth, many did not want him in charge of the nation’s security, because of his past links to Hamas and the IRA, as well as his stance on nuclear weapons for the United Kingdom.

GRENFELL TOWER

On 14th June 2017, a fire was started on the 4th floor of a 24-storey high council flat. As of 28th June, the death toll was 80, with many others still missing and around 74 injured.

Despite Theresa May promising £5 million for the families that were affected by the tragedy and going to the area to visit those affected in hospital, people criticised May by calling her a “coward” and “murderer”. While it is natural to feel aggrieved in these situations, many thought it was inappropriate for people to abuse May in public.

Image result for grenfell protests

The Grenfell community demanded answers from Theresa May from her recent visit. Will an enquiry led by Sir Martin Moore-Bick be welcomed? Credit: The Independent

It is most likely that if this event took place before the election, May would have lost, not necessarily for her policies, but just due to the natural anger felt by those in Kensington.

These events will test May’s ability under pressure. Only time will tell, whether she can survive this latest political storm…

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén