Ben's opinions. Check them out.

Category: United States

George Floyd and the sad truth of racism, not only in the US, but the UK

So, I’m sure by now we know the news of another African-American man being murdered by police. I don’t know about you, but this particular incident made me furious, and if you knew me very well, you’d know that not much gets me upset. It is not only about police brutality but the topic of racism against blacks as a whole.

“I can’t breathe”

I have been talking about the incident with my family on a daily basis, and as a young black British man, there was a feeling of “Is this who we are as humans?”

But people like me, not just in the US, have had enough.

George Floyd should still be alive today. What angers me about the whole situation is the manner in which events played out.

George Floyd and the subsequent protests after his murder
Source: Metro.co.uk

“A forgery in process.” Now while I do not know what was said between the officers and George Floyd, I do not understand why Floyd was mistreated for this allegation. If counterfeit money was given, why couldn’t Police have simply asked him to pay the sum? My mum and I had a conversation the other day, and she said she sometimes mistakenly gives coin change in the wrong currency shortly after returning from our holidays. Police are not called, but rather, her and the cashier laugh it off and she pays the correct amount. Who’s to say that he received a counterfeit bill from a previous transaction and did not know that it was not legal tender?

In the aftermath of the atrocious crime by Derek Chauvin and the other police officers, there have been protests in all 50 states, as well as all around the world, in places such as the UK, Germany and Canada and Australia.

I do not condone the violence and looting which has taken place, because you are destroying certain people’s livelihoods, particularly those from poorer backgrounds. However, because there is ongoing systemic racism, you can understand why many blacks are angry. If you provoke someone so much after they peacefully try to reach a compromise, it is as if the instigators are not adhering to the terms of their social contract. If police, who are meant to “protect and serve”, abuse their power against minorities, you cannot expect people to be civil and obedient. They’ll want to fight back. I keep seeing the quote from Dr. Martin Luther King Jr, which is “riots are the voice of the unheard”. Powerful.

The four officers charged with Floyd’s murder
Source: CNN

What can institutions do to make the UK less ignorant?

While I was in high school, history was one of my favourite subjects. But now when I think about George Floyd’s murder, I do believe the UK can do more in educating students about its own painful past regarding black people. I am grateful that I live in a household that is incredibly knowledgeable, because events about black history which they did not teach in school, continue to be taught by my parents. One could say that if the UK did not have stringent, clear laws and banned firearms, who’s to say that the police would not abuse their power over here? That is why I do not buy it when people say, “Oh look at America, they have so many problems.” We have our own problems too.

The reason I mention history lessons is because the current curriculum does not include pertinent black history topics for all students from a young age. We are taught about the Battle of Hastings, British monarchies, and the World Wars. I was taught about the US Civil Rights Movement as part of my GCSE coursework. But when I thought this, I asked myself, when, where and how often does the British curriculum address its own history of racial problems?

Does the UK talk about its role in the Atlantic slave trade, which was arguably the worst? Do we talk about British colonialism? Do we teach about abolitionism and the likes of William Wilberforce? What about the Windrush generation that had been ignored for so long that it was only in the news a couple of years ago? What about learning about racially charged incidents against black men such as Stephen Lawrence?

If they did I am sure that there would be less ignorant people. Exposure to your own countries’ history puts the matter at hand in perspective, allowing more empathy of others regardless of their race.

Stephen Lawrence was a black man who was killed in a racially motivated attack, in South-East London, in 1993
Source: The Independent

What YOU can do to become less ignorant and create change

It was good to see many of my friends showing solidarity, sharing social media stories and supporting black businesses after the Floyd incident. However, one can do more than upload a black screen on their Instagram page with a hashtag. I know that some people are doing it to show support for the Black Lives Matter movement, however, change is needed. It starts with home education at a young age.

“You’re not born a bigot; you have to learn to be a bigot. Anything you learn, you can unlearn.” This was said by Jane Elliott. Jerome Boateng recently said, “no child is born racist”. Simple words, but it has to be said.

Parents and legal guardians have a primary responsibility to teach positive attitudes towards other races because children model the behaviour of their parents.

I experienced “micro-aggression” growing up in London and Norwich regularly. The phrase “micro-aggression” is one I do not like. I believe it is a pretext for making racist jokes.

“Oh, you speak very well, what type of school did you go to?”

“Ben, you’re so white.”

“Is your favourite restaurant KFC?”

These are the kind of phrases I heard growing up. Can you see the ignorance? Can black people not be good orators regardless of the type of school they attend? Why can’t being black mean having a calm and collected demeanour, where you treat people with respect?

I did not let such statements upset me, because growing up my parents taught me to behave with magnanimity. However, statements such as those above should not be the norm and when this occurs it needs to be called out for what it is.

I have been asked what we can do as a society. We need to educate ourselves by reading books. We also need to watch films and documentaries that relate to this matter. We are in lockdown due to COVID-19, so try to learn something new. Subsequently, we must educate our families and friends. Yes, it is a sensitive topic but I’d rather white people talk to blacks about the reality of this issue, instead of shying away from it or even blurting out silly remarks which should have been confined to the past.

This is Stephen Lawrence’s mother, Baroness Doreen Lawrence talking to my sister, Alice. She was invited by my sister to talk at our high school about why we should celebrate and embrace diversity.
Source: Norwich School

Aside from protesting, those who are eligible to vote must do so. Second, to bring about change, writing to your local MP is a simple but effective way to express grievances. Third is signing petitions at the https://petition.parliament.uk/ website. Debates in Parliament are triggered if 100,000 signatures are reached. Finally, visiting Central Lobby in Parliament, as you do not need to make an appointment to meet your MP, although an appointment is recommended. The desk at Central Lobby will attempt to contact the MP you are asking for.

There are other ways of getting involved.

Below are a few of my recommendations:

BOOKS: Reni Eddo-Lodge’s “Why I am No Longer Talking to White People About Race.”

Robin DiAngelo’s “White Fragility.”

FILMS: Coach Carter starring Samuel L. Jackson (everyone should watch this), When They See Us (both of these are on Netflix UK as of 4th June 2020).

Change can happen, only if you really want it.

TRUMP’S IMPEACHMENT – A SENSE OF INEVITABILITY?

trump point

Trump addresses media (AL JAZEERA)

The Appointment of a Special Counsel is only taken when matters of serious national interest are at stake when there are concerns that senior officials have abused their office.

The US Justice Department appointed former FBI Director Robert S Mueller III as special counsel to oversee the federal investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, including potential collusion between President Donald Trump’s campaign and Russian officials.

In a rare press conference Special Counsel Robert Mueller clearly stated that his report does not exonerate the President of the United States.

We know that Mueller’s findings did not result in an indictment for the President.

But what does this mean?

Well according to Department of Justice guidelines, a sitting President cannot be indicted by this entity. However, there is one who can….

Step forward the United States Congress….

Before Robert Mueller’s rare interview, the Democrats would have felt as though they would have to hold fire with impeachment proceedings, because it would look like a partisan hit. However, after the redacted Mueller report was released on his investigation and Attorney General Bill Barr’s attempt to mislead the public his controversial summary, Mueller stepped forward into public eye and in a way, almost gave Democrats the green light to impeach Donald Trump.

As someone from the UK, you felt Mueller had to say something, whether it was just on a podium to clear up Barr’s statements or to testify before Congress, which he had been invited to do.

Impeachment is now looking more likely than ever, despite the fact that Democrats hold only the House. Justin Amash who is a Republican has been the first Republican to state that impeachment is a possibility.

Image: Senate Judiciary Committee


UNITED STATES – JUNE 19: FBI Director Robert Mueller testifies before a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing in Dirksen Building on oversight of the FBI. (Photo By Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call)

What is impeachment?

The United Kingdom Parliament would not likely not carry out impeachment. The UK actually has this power, but it is regarded as obsolete, so it is rarely used, and the phrase is never spoken. We instead have judicial review and more commonly used confidence motions, which can be used for removal of a party leader.

In the US, impeachment is the removal of any government official outlined in the Constitution, due to “high crimes and misdemeanours”. Essentially, the President must be well behaved and not upset the opposition party in order to not have proceedings against filed against him.

There have only been 2 proper proceedings in the history of the US – Andrew Johnson in 1868 and Bill Clinton in 1998. Both were unsuccessful.

Why is there talk of a Trump impeachment? Is it likely? Or is it just a nothing-burger that his base repeatedly claim?

The arguments for:

 

RUSSIAGATE

trump putin helsinki


A picture from the Helsinki summit that speaks 1000 words (THE WEEKLY STANDARD)

During his first term, Trump has repeatedly been accused of “colluding” and/or “conspiring” with Russia, even as far back as the 1980s.

There had been many suggestions that this may have been true.

–        The Steele Dossier written by a former MI6 officer Christopher Steele.

–        Trump’s refusal to deride Putin but instead abuse and name-call US allies.

–        His facial reactions and body language when he is around Putin? Particularly after the Helsinki summit. He went against the findings of his own intelligence agencies and sided with a foreign adversary.

–        The removal of sanctions against Russia

–        Refusal to release his tax returns, which could show he’s indebted to Russia businessmen and oligarchs.

–        Majority of his associates being indicted to criminal activity relating to Russia, including his former lawyer, Michael Cohen.

DAILY EMBARRASSMENT

trump the squad NY post


The Four Congresswomen Democratic Freshmen (Rashida Tlaib, Ayanna Pressley, Ilhan Omar and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) have all been attacked by the POTUS (NY POST)

The times where Trump has been praised for his speeches have been minimal.

He regularly Tweets on Twitter either to say something controversial or downright false or he will attack any critic of his.

Recently, he went after 4 freshmen Congresswomen, who all happen to be minorities saying they should “go back to the places from which they came”.

Even if you disagree with a President’s or Prime Minister’s policies, the least they can do to show that they are a worthy leader, is to show some decorum and respect.

This is the President of the USA ladies and gents

 

Unindicted co-conspirator

cohen senate nbc


Michael Cohen about to testify before Congress (NBC NEWS)

Michael Cohen, the President’s former lawyer and “fixer” was arrested for crimes committed at the direction of “Individual One”.

Individual One (Trump) was named as an unindicted co-conspirator for his crimes which included hush money payments to Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal.

Having to go to jail for someone else’s crimes would leave a bitter taste in the mouth, especially if that individual was the President.

Cohen’s 2019 testimony was received international attention as one of Trump’s former confidants exposed his misdemeanours.

All valid reasons yes?

Why has it not started?

Democrats dragging their feet?

pelosi national review

Speaker Pelosi has repeatedly said impeachment should not be the main focus for Dems (NATIONAL REVIEW)

On the issue of Trumps impeachment there is a dichotomy in the Democratic party. The party leadership under Speaker Nancy Pelosi and a majority of the caucus hold the position that the case needs to be cast-iron and needs to enjoy bipartisan support such it would not get defeated in the senate. The other camp is pro-impeachment and feels that Trump has committed significant offences and brought the Office of President into disrepute.

Chairperson of the House Financial services Committee Maxine Waters has been calling for impeachment for several months. She has been joined by many of that newer ‘progressive’ members of the house. Among the Democratic presidential hopefuls Senator Elizabeth Warren was the first to state her support for Trumps impeachment.

So why don’t Dems just start then?

They have many cases that they can look into.

I mean they can even take inspiration from Bill Clinton’s trial.

The Clinton impeachment did not start with the Monica Lewinsky affair. Ken Starr was put there to essentially see if he could find any wrongdoings and initially, he couldn’t find anything with the Whitewater investigation, and it wasn’t until the Paula Jones scandal that Starr broadened his investigation into Clinton’s private life.

If the Democrats do this, more findings can reveal themselves,

But by just being idle, Trump is essentially given free-reign to act as he pleases.

Texan House of Representatives member Al Green tabled a motion for impeachment which was debated on but this motion was defeated which shows how untouchable the POTUS seems at the moment.

Examination of the numbers of votes indicates that in the House there is steady increase in support for Nancy Pelosi commencing impeachment hearings. With the public testimony of Robert Mueller looming it remains to be seen whether Donald Trump will be able to keep the pro-impeachment crowd at bay.

 

What do I think?

This is the President of the USA ladies and gents….,

My opinion which I am sure is held by the majority of the people out there is that the US can do so much better than this guy, Trump. I have never really seen a President act like this

Even if you want to “say it as it is”, informal personality can at least come with some form of civility for people who may not agree with your beliefs.

Perhaps, it will be happen in the near future, as he seems to hit new lows, on a near daily basis.

 

The Russia Story continues

It looks as if US President Trump’s inevitable impeachment is getting closer each day, with the first bombshell of 2018…….
Michael Wolff a well-known controversial author decided to publish the book, revealing chaos that had been going on in the White House since the inception of the Trump presidency.
Interestingly, Wolff had been invited to various parts of the White House, being allowed to observe and take notes in meetings that were going on.
Trump had allowed Wolff to interview him many times, over 200 times in fact, because he liked a story that Wolff had written about him in the Hollywood Reporter.
trump and wolff
 It seems shocking that Trump would allow a reporter to conduct many interviews and be present for many confidential meetings. This was bound to happen in a large form eventually, because his own White House staff have been leaking stories to the press anonymously.
The book called “Fire and Fury” was named after Trump’s threat to North Korea, after having an argument with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un over the two countries nuclear capabilities.
Once the book had been announced, by Wolff, Trump’s lawyer attempted to block its release using a cease and desist order. It was ultimately unsuccessful, which even led to Wolff pushing the release date one day forward, due to popular demand.
However, why would Trump want obtain a court order to block the sale of a book?
I don’t think embarrassment is the issue. He lavishes in doing that already.
Or is he just scared?
This is the key…. This could be Trump’s downfall:
Steve Bannon.
Steve Bannon has been through “Day 1”. He has stuck with Trump from his controversial statements from his days on the campaign trail, to his antics on the world stage in the Oval Office. He has insulted opponents of Trump, such as CNN and MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough, to show loyalty. Even after leaving his post as chief strategist, he continued to support Trump, often calling him offering support when General Kelly, the White House Chief of Staff was not around.
The Washington Post reported that Trump and Bannon were still talking in October 2017:

trump and bannon

Did Michael Wolff somehow twist his words to get closer to Trump and his team? Credit- ABC NEWS

However, Trump made a fatal mistake. We all know that when the media focuses on a story regarding Mr Trump, he likes to use Twitter to complain about it or attack an individual.
Here, when it was revealed that Bannon had made comments in Wolff’s book, Trump took to cameras and Twitter to make his feelings known:
“Steve Bannon has nothing to do with me or my presidency.”
“When he was fired, he lost his mind.”
This was a Trump White House statement to the press after they pressed him for his opinion on Steve Bannon’s remarks.

trump book tweet

Trump’s tweet on Bannon regarding Bannon’s job   Credit- Twitter: @realDonaldTrump

This could spell bad news for Trump.
Why?
He doesn’t seem to understand that Bannon is a “snake”. He is no longer in a job at the White House, so he is free to say whatever he wants.
Bannon recently said that Mueller would crack Donald Trump Jr like an egg, due to “treasonous” meetings with the Russians.

trump jr and muller

Should Don Jr have a reason to be worried? Credit- liberalamerica.org

 However, on 7th January 2018, Bannon apologised, stating that President Trump was a “great man” and a “patriot.”
It seems to me as if Bannon is trying to play mind games with Trump.
If you really wished your boss well or were trying to stop more revelations coming out for the Russian investigation, you would keep quiet.
Most people that Trump has insulted, including his own supporters, other people on his transition team and Republican Senators, have still stuck with him through his controversy.
If you look at it, Bannon is really the first to say anything revealing to the public.
Could this book be the end of Trump?

trump book cover

As of 20th January 2018, it is the best selling book in it’s genre worldwide Credit- Amazon

It’s all about Trump?

trump pence

Credit: forward.com

Misogynistic

Moronic

Outspoken

President

The Trump phenomenon.

Here are just a few superlatives that voters, analysts, political scientists and the general public have used to describe Mr. Trump.

Some still can’t comprehend how he won. For many, it has given them hope. The fact that you can repeatedly lie and fear-monger a section of people to push through your agenda? Opponents have stated that he has not said one thing of substance, to make them consider him for the most powerful job in the world, during the campaign or as acting POTUS. Political commentators and analysts have criticised Bush for his policies, as well as Obama. However, some say that the “political landscape has completely changed” and that “rules have been re-written”, since Trump has arrived in the White House.

trump gop

The many faces of Donald Trump, from a GOP debate. Credit: CNN Politics

We have seen Trump evade so much, throughout his lifetime, surviving many scandals and controversies, to deflecting attention away from his business dealings, in and out of government. Some have argued that it is partly due to his name and his organisation that has made him “untouchable”. More recently, Presidential privilege has been a significant factor.

However, are his days numbered?

Will he be the second US post-war President to be impeached?

Is there another Watergate on the horizon?

Would Mike Pence be an improvement?

Voters and political commentators have said that if he was elected, he would get voted out at the next election or not survive a full first term.

The latter seems to be the consensus currently, but the question is why?

clintons

Bill Clinton remains the only post-war President to be impeached. Will Trump be next? Credit: CBS News

Some have said it’s because of his basic lack of knowledge, generally and politically and his inability to show at least a “smidge” of succinct policy understanding, in any field.

Others have said it’s because of his dodgy business deals in the past. For example, the POTUS has repeatedly refused to show his tax returns to the public, despite there being no valid reason why he should not.

However, I think the main reason he would and is going to leave the White House, is due to his ties to Russia.

Here’s why….

DNC HACKING

Emails. Emails. Emails.

Clinton lost due to her emails?

I feel that a Trump victory came to fruition due to his claim that Clinton was this “dishonest, corrupt and CROOKED” politician.

This is true, because after a hack, it was revealed that the Democratic National Convention (DNC) had been hacked by an individual under the persona “Guccifer 2.0”. Guccifer 2.0 claimed that he was Romanian like his predecessor “Guccifer”, who in 2013, had started the Hillary e-mail scandal.

Image result for hacker us election

Was Russia behind all of this or like some have argued, was it just an everyday hacker that wanted to see Hillary Clinton fall? Credit: ABC News

2.0 denied involvement, claiming he was Romanian like his infamous predecessor.

However, after investigation from many cyber-security firms and CIA, they claimed that it was the Russians that were behind the hack, using the name to cover up their misdemeanours.

On 10th April 2017, a Russian hacker was arrested in connection to this scandal.

Russian hacker arrested in Spain upon US request: BBC NEWS

Will there be more revelations?

TRUMP ADMIN TEAM

When Trump decided on his Cabinet appointments, many of his selections have been considered odd and dangerous, due to their respective histories personally and in government. Some have argued that this is the messiest transition of power in US history.

Michael Flynn who was Trump’s national security advisor first made me realise that this “Russian problem” was a bit suspicious. Initially, commentators were a bit sceptical to Russia’s involvement. However, much of the public now feel that they had a massive influence. Flynn was revealed to have had contact with Russian officials, including Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak and to have lied about this to VP Mike Pence. He resigned as he faced pressure from many Democrats, who said that his position was untenable. Later, in March, when Flynn offered to testify in exchange for immunity from prosecution, a lot of people knew that something was up.

sergey

Contemplation. Kislyak allegedly had contact with the Michael Flynn. Credit: The New Yorker

Later, people had recalled him earlier stating in 2016, that anyone that is granted immunity, “has probably committed a crime”.

Jefferson Beauregard Sessions from Alabama.

A man that has made questionable remarks in the past. He once said that one particular organisation (known for their white robes and horrific actions against African Americans) were okay, until he realised they “smoked marijuana.” (1)

Yet, he’s appointed Attorney General, who deal with legal affairs in the Justice Department.

During his confirmation hearing, he was asked whether he had contacted Russians during the election campaign. He denied this. However, his lies came to haunt him, when it was it revealed that he did indeed have contact. He too faced calls for resignation, when it was revealed that he had lied under oath. Sessions initially denied this again, however he later said that he would “recuse” himself from investigation into the Russian interference of the US election.

This is the first time any Attorney General has had to “recuse” his or herself, from any investigation.

sessions

Former Senator for Alabama, Jeff Sessions said under oath that he did not have contact with the Russians. Credit: The Hill

PUTIN

Have you noticed that Trump has repeatedly mentioned Putin despite not even being asked about him?

Could this just be an extensive admiration for a “tough-guy” figure that has been described as authoritarian by critics.

It has been proven that Trump contradicts himself all the time. However, with Putin, he has done this on multiple occasions.

e.g. Oct 2015 – Trump tells a commentator that he met Putin a long time ago and that he was a “nice guy”.

July 2016 – Trump tells CBS that he doesn’t know Trump and that he’s never spoken to him.

On more than 5 occasions has Trump alleged meeting with Putin, then later stating that he’s never met him. Like many, I do not know if he’s lying or if he genuinely cannot remember what he has said….

putin

Putin has repeatedly denied any Russian government involvement in the US election. Credit: NBC News.

To conclude, it doesn’t look too good for him, does it? From my perspective, I think that if he does get impeached, not only will everything in his government be revealed, but his deals and any other scandals will pop up again.

It may just be the most remarkable political story yet….

(1) The Guardian. (2018). Jeff Sessions to crack down on legalized marijuana, ending Obama-era policy. [online] Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/jan/04/jeff-sessions-to-crack-down-on-legalized-marijuana-ending-obama-era-policy [Accessed 9 Oct. 2023].

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén